They say you can't ever
really understand
someone else until
you've walked in their
shoes, a sobering
thought for anyone
contemplating the new
exhibit at the
Mashantucket Pequot
Museum, “Booming Out:
Mohawk Ironworkers Build
New York.”
Generations of Mohawk
Indians have been
“sky-walkers,” helping
to construct some of the
most famous features of
New York City's skyline.
They were first
recruited to the trade
by economic necessity,
and later by a proud
tribal tradition.
It's dangerous,
awe-inspiring work, and
ordinarily I wouldn't
have any sense of what
it's like to navigate
such a dizzying
position. Several years
ago I got to know
something about Indian
sky-walkers, however,
from the pages of an
unforgettable novel by
Sherman Alexie, titled
“Indian Killer.”
I got the book, a
dog-eared paperback with
some passages underlined
and notes in the
margins, from Jose
Gonzalez, a professor of
English at the U.S.
Coast Guard Academy in
New London. You may have
read about him recently,
as he was named Poet of
the Year by the New
England Association of
Teachers of English.
A native of El
Salvador, Gonzalez had
just gotten another
award, for increasing
multicultural awareness,
when I interviewed him
in 2003. Indian identity
in one form or another
has been news here for a
long time, so I asked
Gonzalez to recommend a
book for me. He handed
me “Indian Killer,”
saying it was a gift.
At first I demurred,
but I agreed to take it
with the understanding
that I would pass it on.
The hero, or
anti-hero, is John
Smith, a Spokane Indian
— like Alexie — adopted
as an infant by an
infertile white couple
and raised around
Seattle, which during
the book's timeline is
terrorized by a serial
killer who scalps white
men.
John becomes a
sky-walker, but what
else he becomes depends,
I think, a lot on the
reader.
What fascinated me,
aside from the novel
itself, was the
scribbling — not too
heavy, not too much,
some in pencil, some in
ink — Gonzalez had left.
At times I felt like I
was reading the book in
tandem with someone
else.
What made all this
especially intriguing
was that I barely knew
the other reader, and he
had a perspective that
was, while not
inscrutable, very
different from mine.
Gonzalez had
underlined the passage,
“Indians had become
invisible, docile. John
wanted to change that.”
Next to a passage in
which a college student
questions a non-Indian's
ability to teach a class
about the Indian
experience, Gonzalez had
written, “Does she have
a point?”
I appreciated the
previous book owner's
insights, and was
tempted to add some of
my own. John's adoptive
parents had, I felt, a
genuine poignancy, as
they tried — however
haplessly — to do the
right thing by exposing
their brown-skinned son
to Indian culture, all
the while hoping that he
wouldn't reject theirs.
In short, they wanted
him to love them like
they were his own. And
if John grew up with a
desperate sense of loss,
his parents lived with a
desperate fear of losing
him.
Perhaps because on
some level I felt the
book wasn't truly mine,
I refrained from writing
in it. Looking back,
however, I think it
belonged to me, too.
I won't ever know
what it means to be a
sky-walker, traversing
an iron beam high up in
the sky, or to be an
American Indian,
traversing one of our
nation's great
historical divides.
But the next best
thing to donning someone
else's shoes can be
reading — and writing —
between the lines.